For the reading life, on and off the shelf.

A lipogram turns a missing letter into a writing challenge

A writer crossing out a chosen letter on a page of original prose.
AI-generated photographic illustration; not documentary photography.

Write a sentence without the letter “e” and familiar shortcuts suddenly disappear. Articles, pronouns and common verbs may need replacing. The exercise is a lipogram: a text written while deliberately excluding a letter or letters.

The Poetry Foundation’s discussion of constraint places this kind of limitation among techniques that can stimulate literary invention. The restriction is part of the composition, not simply an accidental feature noticed afterwards.

A small experiment before a whole story

Here is an original example that avoids “e”: Rain taps on tin. A small cat waits by a shut door. The scene is ordinary. The constraint becomes interesting when you try to continue it naturally without reaching for awkward substitutes.

First write three or four unconstrained sentences about a room. Then rewrite the same scene while excluding one common letter. Check every word, including the small connecting words that are easy to overlook. Finally, read the result aloud without announcing the rule.

What changed? Perhaps you replaced an abstract description with a concrete object. Perhaps the narrator now sounds formal because a familiar word was unavailable. Perhaps the sentence became shorter and more direct. None of those results is automatically better, but each reveals a choice that ordinary drafting can hide.

Read for more than the missing character

When reading a longer lipogram, noticing the technical feat is only one layer. Ask whether the constraint shapes voice, humour, pacing or the world of the story. A successful passage may make its restrictions almost invisible; another may invite the reader to enjoy the strain.

Translation adds a further question. A frequently used letter in one language does not occupy exactly the same role in another, so preserving a constraint can require substantial invention. Check the edition’s translator or introductory note before assuming that the same formal task has been carried over unchanged.

Keep both versions of your room description. Comparing them is more revealing than deleting the unrestricted one. The exercise is not a contest to ban as much language as possible; it is a way to hear the habits that appear when an easy route is closed.